<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE>Re: [Discuss] List traffic too much?</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<FONT COLOR="#808000"><FONT FACE="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:12.0px'>Dear John<BR>
<BR>
As ever you are right on target. A Park keeper YES. But strangely the consensus appears to be to DEMOLISH the perfectly nice ( and admired by Architects) Bowls Pavilion. This would be a perfect home for a Park Keeper – and why are we in such a rush to knock it down. Underneath is a dark dank piece of the Green – we could have this pavilion as a centre.<BR>
<BR>
I do think your suggestion of a park keeper would be the SOLUTION. He or she could go about on a bike to the other greens and the problem would be over for really a small outlay.\<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
Anne<BR>
</SPAN></FONT></FONT><FONT FACE="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:12.0px'><BR>
<BR>
On 21/4/10 18:31, "John Lawton" <chair@soscambridge.org.uk> wrote:<BR>
<BR>
<FONT COLOR="#0000FF">> Anne,<BR>
> <BR>
> Fires are already forbidden, and the new notices will reflect <BR>
> this. I think the issue is then enforcement. Quite some time ago I <BR>
> said at a meeting that what was needed was a Park Keeper. I think <BR>
> the audience agreed. Quite how this could be achieved is a good <BR>
> question, but I think it is the ultimate answer to enforcement, and <BR>
> would bring other benefits to the commons and green spaces.<BR>
> <BR>
> John<BR>
> <BR>
> At 18:23 21/04/2010, Anne wrote:<BR>
</FONT><FONT COLOR="#008000">>> Well I have been out and about but frankly contributing to what I <BR>
>> think is a very worthwhile discussion hardly takes more than a <BR>
>> minute and could have a really positive effect.<BR>
>> <BR>
>> If by the ' very different needs' you include a need to burn big <BR>
>> holes in beautiful natural and verdant Spring grass, I simply cannot <BR>
>> agree that this either a need or a right. Isn't that what this <BR>
>> discussion is all about? If you think that interfering with people's <BR>
>> freedoms is worth the price you have to pay ˆ spoilation of the <BR>
>> scene in my view ˆ then that must be your view. Many people would <BR>
>> disagree, but it doesn't make them less freedom loving or <BR>
>> libertarian. Surely you have to draw the line somewhere?<BR>
</FONT><FONT COLOR="#0000FF">> <BR>
> <BR>
> ---------------------------------------------------------<BR>
> Save Our green Spaces<BR>
> <a href="http://www.soscambridge.org.uk">http://www.soscambridge.org.uk</a><BR>
> --------------------------------------------------------- <BR>
> <BR>
> <BR>
> _______________________________________________<BR>
> discuss mailing list<BR>
> discuss@soscambridge.org.uk<BR>
> <a href="http://soscambridge.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/discuss_soscambridge.org.uk">http://soscambridge.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/discuss_soscambridge.org.uk</a><BR>
</FONT></SPAN></FONT>
</BODY>
</HTML>