[Discuss] List traffic too much?

[Anne Garvey]

Dear John

As ever you are right on target. A Park keeper YES. But strangely the
consensus appears to be to DEMOLISH the perfectly nice ( and admired by
Architects) Bowls Pavilion. This would be a perfect home for a Park Keeper ­
and why are we in such a rush to knock it down. Underneath is a dark dank
piece of the Green ­ we could have this pavilion as a centre.

I do think your suggestion of a park keeper would be the SOLUTION. He or she
could go about on a bike to the other greens and the problem would be over
for really a small outlay.\


Anne


On 21/4/10 18:31, "John Lawton" <chair at soscambridge.org.uk> wrote:

> Anne,
> 
> Fires are already forbidden, and the new notices will reflect
> this.  I think the issue is then enforcement.  Quite some time ago I
> said at a meeting that what was needed was a Park Keeper.  I think
> the audience agreed.   Quite how this could be achieved is a good
> question, but I think it is the ultimate answer to enforcement, and
> would bring other benefits to the commons and green spaces.
> 
> John
> 
> At 18:23 21/04/2010, Anne wrote:
>> Well I have been out and about but frankly contributing to what I
>> think is a very worthwhile discussion hardly takes more than a
>> minute and could have a really positive effect.
>> 
>> If by the ' very different needs' you include a need to burn big
>> holes in beautiful natural and verdant Spring grass, I simply cannot
>> agree that this either a need or a right. Isn't that what this
>> discussion is all about? If you think that interfering with people's
>> freedoms is worth the price you have to pay – spoilation of the
>> scene in my view – then that must be your view. Many people would
>> disagree, but it doesn't make them less freedom loving or
>> libertarian.  Surely you have to draw the line somewhere?
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------
> Save Our green Spaces
> http://www.soscambridge.org.uk
> ---------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> discuss mailing list
> discuss at soscambridge.org.uk
> http://soscambridge.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/discuss_soscambridge.org.uk

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://soscambridge.org.uk/pipermail/discuss_soscambridge.org.uk/attachments/20100421/6e59cdd9/attachment-0001.htm>